Man Held: Man held for a day for touching woman’s bottom | India News


MUMBAI: Observing that the offence is heinous in nature and there’s no purpose to let off the accused on a bond of excellent behaviour, a Justice of the Peace’s court docket sentenced to “rising of the court docket” a 45-year-old man for repeatedly touching the underside of a lady on a Churchgate-bound native in 2019.
When an accused is sentenced till the rising of the court docket, he’s held in custody till the day’s proceedings finish.The lady who was accompanied by her brother caught the accused, Raju Chavan, and handed him over to the police. Metropolitan Justice of the Peace B Ok Gawande stated the lady’s proof clearly established that the accused did the act with an intention and data that her modesty would definitely be outraged.
“Additionally it is submitted that no woman will put stigma upon her merely as a result of any person touched her buttocks and with none purpose,” the Justice of the Peace stated. The lady deposed that the incident came about on August 13, 2019, between 9.24am and 9.28am at Bandra railway station. On the day of the incident, her brother and she or he had been travelling from Borivli railway station to Elphinstone by Churchgate quick native prepare. At Bandra railway station, the lady stood close to the door as she was about to get down at Dadar railway station. At the moment, the accused stood behind her and began touching her buttocks. The lady shouted, “what’s going on”. At the moment, the accused stated, “It was improper, sorry”.
The accused, nevertheless, repeated the act after which the lady picked up a quarrel with the accused. Her brother, who was seated in the identical compartment, observed the incident. The siblings then caught maintain of the accused and alighted at Bandra railway station. There, they knowledgeable the police concerning the incident. The lady’s brother, too, deposed. The Justice of the Peace refuted the defence of the accused that another passenger could have touched her.
The Justice of the Peace stated that so far as the defence of the accused is anxious, it finds no place in existence of concrete proof on document.





Source link