HC’s ‘Final’ Warning To DC Over Odisha Woman’s 46-Year-Long Fight For Family Pension | India News

[ad_1]

Odisha woman's 46-year wait for pension

Odisha lady’s 46-year await pension.

Picture : iStock

Bhubaneswar: A 91-year-old lady’s 4 many years lengthy await household pension may finish quickly as Orissa HC has given Kendrapada district collector Suryawanshi Mayur Vikas remaining warning with one month’s time. The HC has requested the DC to make preparations for the disbursal of household pension to the lady who misplaced her husband, a college trainer, 46 years again in 1977, a Instances of India report stated.

The court docket’s order comes 4 months after HC requested the district collector to sanction household pension to Hara Sahoo, whose husband handed away on Aug 26, 1977, the report added. The order was handed on Nov 15, 2023

In its order, the court docket instructed the collector to launch the pension from the date of entitlement “together with arrears inside a interval of two months from the date of receipt of order”. Nonetheless, the lady didn’t acquired the pension.

The lady lives along with her son, a 60-year-old retired fisheries division worker, daughter-in-law, three grandsons and two granddaughters at Palei Derakundi in Kendrapada district.

The case data present tha the lady had filed a number of pleas to the varsity and mass schooling authorities in Kendrapada since 1991, however in useless. Final yr on Aug 21, the Kendrapada district collector rejected her request for household pension, gratuity, and different service advantages stating that the case was not eligible. The collector stated, as per TOI, that the scheme was launched in 1980-81, whereas the husband died in 1977.

The lady then approached the Excessive Court docket in October which quashed the Kendrapada collector’s order. The court docket famous that if the husband had been alive, he would have retired in 1983, making him eligible for the pension scheme.

The HC requested the DC to disburse pension to the lady ‘inside a interval of two months from the date of receipt of order’.

Nonetheless, when she didn’t obtain the identical, she moved a contempt plea. The one choose bench of Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy stated on Friday, “This contempt petition is disposed of by granting one-month additional time to the contemnor to adjust to the order.”

“If the order shouldn’t be complied with inside the prolonged time, it is going to be held as deliberate violation of this court docket’s order,” the HC warned.

[ad_2]

Source link